Contact Us    
Ron Paul For President

Diverse groups should support him, because he supports the Constitution.

by James Leroy Wilson
March 22, 2007

Bookmark and Share
Ron Paul For President
Peaceniks have found their Presidential candidate. His name is Ron Paul.
The "get the U.S. out of the U.N" crowd and opponents of the New World Order have found their candidate. His name is Ron Paul.
Those who want to reform our drug laws have found candidate who will not just legalize medical marijuana, but all drugs. His name is Ron Paul.
Populists who want to get us out of NAFTA, CAFTA, and the World Trade Organization have found their candidate. His name is Ron Paul.
Laissez-faire entrepreneurs have found their candidate. His name is Ron Paul.
Pro-lifers have found their candidate, a man who has introduced legislation stripping the federal courts from reviewing abortion cases, effectively overturning Roe v. Wade and returning the question to the states. His name is Ron Paul
Anti-tax libertarians have found their candidate. His name is Ron Paul.
Enemies of inflation have found their candidate. His name is Ron Paul.
Members of the Religious Right who want to put God back into the schools have found their candidate. His name is Ron Paul.
Free speech advocates who oppose all censorship have found their candidate. His name is Ron Paul.
Opponents of unlimited immigration and amnesty have found their candidate. His name is Ron Paul.
Civil libertarians who strongly oppose the Patriot Acts, warrant-less spying, the national ID card, torture, and the revocation of habeas corpus have found their Presidential candidate. His name is Ron Paul.
The man with a 100% rating from the Conservative Index also got a 61% "liberal" rating from the National Journal - the second highest score for a Republican. He's not one of those northeastern Republicans either; he's a Texan. His name is Ron Paul.
One candidate served in the Air Force and, in his real job before and in between stints in Congress, delivered 4000 babies. His name is Ron Paul, M.D.
One candidate who has served in Congress for 18 years is blacked out by the major media, which is not acknowledging his candidacy at all - even so much as to put his name in the polls. His name is Ron Paul.
One would think this "maverick" candidate for the Republican nomination for President must be a man with many contradictions. Based on what you've read above, you might think Paul is not "consistent" on the issues. Or maybe he's an "extremist," whose ideas are so dangerous that the Establishment's options are to ignore him as best as possible, or kill him.
Is Ron Paul a throwback, a reactionary? Or is he the future? In a way, he's both.
Paul's views are similar to those of the American Revolutionaries. And of the Jeffersonian Republicans. They remind one of Andrew Jackson, who abolished the unconstitutional National Bank, but also of the anti-Jacksonian Whigs who opposed Jackson's dictatorial style. They remind one of Martin van Buren, who kept his hands off the economy and spent his Presidency preventing wars instead of starting them. Of Grover Cleveland and the Bourbon Democrats who opposed imperialism and government hand-outs to Big Business, and supported low tariffs and the Gold Standard. Of the opponents of World War I and Prohibition. Of the anti-New Deal, America First "Old Right." And of some latter-day conservatives tired of high taxes and "legislation from the bench." And, of course, of the modern-day libertarian movement that believes government should be as small as possible and should just leave people alone.
Ron Paul has a reputation in Congress as "Dr. No." If he believes that the Constitution does not authorize a particular law or appropriation, he will vote against it. Often, his is the only "No" vote. When he's in the White House, expect a record number of vetoes.
The Constitution is the foundation of many of Paul's beliefs. Paul has a common-sense interpretation of the language and structure of the Constitution. He will enforce what the Constitution says, not what he wishes it to mean. Nor will he ignore it; ignoring the Constitution is the source of most of the problems facing America today, and is also the gateway to tyranny. Most federal criminal laws, particularly our drug laws, are unconstitutional; such restraints on personal behavior are properly and constitutionally left to the states. Most federal programs designed to "help" individuals and communities are also unconstitutional, as are most regulations on business. Paul would cut taxes and spending sharply, reduce America's prison population of non-violent drug offenders, end corporate welfare and protective tariffs, and deregulate the economy to allow small businesses and entrepreneurs to compete freely.
Paul's interpretation of the Constitution, which is also mine, sees the federal government as limited by what the Constitution authorizes, and the states virtually unlimited except where the Constitution explicitly puts restrictions and prohibitions on them. Thus, abortion shouldn't be decided by the federal government one way or the other, because it is out of its Constitutional jurisdiction, but the Constitution doesn't prohibit states from banning abortion. Whether or not there is prayer in public schools is a question the federal courts shouldn't interfere with, because the First Amendment only prevents Congress, not the states, from making a law "respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof." One may not like the laws a state may pass, but that doesn't mean Congress or the Courts have the authority to overrule such laws. Such abrogation of state power by the federal government is actually the bigger threat; better to have some people suffer under bad state laws than have everyone suffer under bad federal laws.
The Constitution does authorize Congress, and Congress only, to declare war; it doesn't authorize Congress to delegate or "authorize" the decision to start war in the President. Paul believes the war in Iraq was wrong-headed and unconstitutional from the start, and advocates a timely and safe pull-out of American troops. Paul would also adhere to a policy of "non-interventionism," wherein the United States would not interfere in the internal affairs of other countries. Paul would end all forms of foreign aid, opposes the expansion of NATO, and advocates withdrawing America from "entangling alliances" wherein we station tens of thousands of troops in countries like South Korea and Germany that are more than capable of defending themselves.
The Congress does authorize Congress to "raise and support Armies" and to "provide and maintain a Navy;" such powers do not belong to the President, and he has no inherent, extra-Constitutional powers as "Commander in Chief of the Army and Navy" to revoke habeas corpus, search people and their houses and effects without a warrant, or inflict cruel and inhuman punishments like torture. Paul would restore the Bill of Rights.
The Congress does have the authority to "coin Money, regulate the Value thereof, and of foreign Coin, and fix the Standard of Weights and Measures." It does not have the authority to transfer this authority to an independent bank such as the Federal Reserve. Paul would abolish the Fed and restore the gold standard, that is, define the dollar as a unit of weight in gold. This would mean that gold would our money, with dollar bills as their representation. The money supply would be limited because the gold supply is limited. Monetary inflation will be conquered.
Along with his strong Constitutionalism, Ron Paul is very strong on national sovereignty. By no means a protectionist, he opposes "free trade" agreements and other international treaties and commitments in which Congress cedes authority to supra-national courts and bureaucracies. Americans ought to make laws for Americans. Not an anarchist, he believes the federal government has the right to determine immigration policy and patrol the borders and coasts to guard against illegal immigrants and terrorists, but opposes anti-immigration policies like a national ID card that would undermine the freedom of Americans.
Ron Paul's views, when one boils them down, reveal moderation and common sense. To ignore the Constitution is to invite tyranny. American troops should protect America, not police the world, and America's own borders and coasts really should be protected. Taxes should be low and tax policy should be neutral, not favoring some groups over others. Inflation is bad and money should actually be backed by something real and valuable, like gold. Most decisions shouldn't be made by the federal government, but by states, local communities, and, most of all, individuals.
A successful Ron Paul campaign will go a long way toward correcting America's course.

Comments (3)

Post a Comment

John from pa writes:
April 2, 2007
I don't think Pro-lifers and the religious right have found some savior in Ron Paul.

Firstly, Ron Paul would simply move (somehow) to the strip the Fed of having any say on abortion. That does NOT mean he would be making it illegal...he's just deferring it to the states....which in turn would keep it legal under varying circumstances. I doubt most northern and western states would deviate much from the current laws. As for some of the more conservative states, it's up to them. That's the point.

As for the religious right, I see no great help other than he would simply refuse to take sides on most of those squabbles anfd defer them to the states.

Again, if you see all that as being some help to those causes, fine. I do not.

BTW, I'm pro-choice, somewhat religious but I don't go to church often (more importantly, I couldn't care less about anybody else's religion...just don't shove it in my face) and I support Ron Paul 100%.

Bob from va writes:
May 22, 2007
Great article about Ron Paul. It brings together all the reasons to support him in one place. I'll be forwarding the link to it to everybody in my address book.

Harold C from California writes:
November 27, 2007
I sit pretty with Ron Paul ending the IRS, however I don't see a cut in taxes as the states will just jack up our taxes to fill the void of getting their share from the government. As for the national ID card, well we already have one, it's called your social security number. Try doing anything (legally) without it.

Send Us Your Opinion
(Comments are moderated.)
Your Name:*

Your E-Mail Address:*
(Confidential. Will not be published.)


Note: In order to control automated spam submissions, URLs are no longer permitted in this form.

Please type the letters you see above.


Bookmark and Share

» jim102670@yahoo.com

Ron Paul Is a Nut (and So Am I)
Published September 10, 2008

Forget about red states and blue states. Wilson's unique take on political topics is refreshingly not politics as usual.

» Buy Now
» More Information
RSS Feed for James Leroy Wilson: RSS Feed for James Leroy Wilson
Sign up to receive an e-mail notice when new articles by this author are published. Your address remains confidential, and you may cancel at any time. A confirmation email will be sent.

Your e-mail address:
po Books
Now Available!

Teachings of a Three Year Old... Turned Tyke,
by Hal Evan Caplan.

A father learns from the wisdom of his toddler.

More Information.

More by James Leroy Wilson
47 for 46 for 45
My favorite movies since when I was born
by James Leroy Wilson, 3/15/16
Hired Gun Quarterbacks
They rarely win the Super Bowl.
by James Leroy Wilson, 2/9/16
Fixing Football's Overtime
Get rid of the coin toss!
by James Leroy Wilson, 1/19/16
Solving the NBA's Conference Imbalance
Get rid of them!
by James Leroy Wilson, 5/26/15
The Problem of School
We develop differently, but arbitrary age rules punish us.
by James Leroy Wilson, 5/19/15
Deflating and defaming Tom Brady
Punishing without evidence
by James Leroy Wilson, 5/12/15
Should Floyd Mayweather be allowed to fight?
The Nevada Athletic Commission is wrong, but not for the reason you think.
by James Leroy Wilson, 4/28/15
» Complete List (565)

RSS Feed for James Leroy Wilson: RSS Feed for James Leroy Wilson

Recently Published
View Article The Last Post
The Partial Observer is no more
by Greg Asimakoupoulos, 10/15/21
The Challenges and Chances of Change
Announcing a coming change
by Greg Asimakoupoulos, 10/8/21
On Each Continent We Worship
A new hymn for World Communion Sunday
by Greg Asimakoupoulos, 10/1/21
Tending the Family Tree
A grandparent's charge
by Greg Asimakoupoulos, 9/24/21
The Cross is Our Ground Zero
Why the cross is the crux of our faith
by Greg Asimakoupoulos, 9/17/21
A Score Recalled
Remembering September 11th twenty years later
by Greg Asimakoupoulos, 9/10/21
A Symphony Heard Around the World
Remembering September 2, 1945
by Greg Asimakoupoulos, 9/3/21

Get the Partial Observer's
'recently published' headlines via RSS.

RSS Feed for Recently Published PO Articles    What is RSS?
Reproduction of original material from The Partial Observer without written permission is strictly prohibited.
The opinions expressed by site contributors do not necessarily reflect those of the editors.
Copyright ©2000-2021 partialobserver.com. All rights reserved.
Home · Site Map · Top