Home
Loading
  Contact Us    
The Case Against The Two Parties

They agree on the main principles... and are wrong.

by James Leroy Wilson
September 25, 2008

Bookmark and Share
The Case Against The Two Parties

Imagine an alternate universe in which racial integration never took place in civil society (such as in baseball) or in law. Slavery was abolished mainly for economic reasons. The 13th, 14th, and 15th Amendments didn't exist. But where, otherwise, the world is pretty much the same, and other social revolutions did take place: the Sexual Revolution, feminism, gay rights, theological liberalism, etc.  In this universe, white supremacists win both the Democratic and Republican nominations for President.

The Democrat is a eugenicist, who believes whites are the most evolved of the species and wants "inferior" races to die out in America through population control and forced sterilizations. The Republican, however, believes that slavery of "people of color" is most ideal, and failing that insists on the the segregation of free minorities.

Aside from this racism, the Culture War rages on. The Democrats are the party of abortion, sex eduction, evolution. The Republicans are the party of aboriton restrictions, abstinence-only education, and creationism.

In foreign affairs, Repubicans insist on "going it alone" so that White America polices the world essentially by itself, whereas Democrats are multi-lateral, believing White America should rule the world with the help of, and in cooperation with, Northern Europe.

Domestically, Republicans and Democrats go back-and-forth, issue-by-issue, whether federal control, or state and local government, would best preserve white supremacy.

If you lived in this universe, who would you vote for?

The godless Democrats? Or the Republican theocrats?

Or will you say, "Wait! Those distinctions are hollow at best! They're both evil!"

Okay, so they're both evil. But don't you have a moral responsibility to choose the lesser of two evils? All that democracy asks of you is your best judgment. You won't be held personally responsible for the consequences.

"Well, I'll vote for a third party instead! Especially for one who shares my anti-racist values!"

The typical response to that is, "Go ahead! Throw your vote away!"

If you found yourself in this alternative universe, and are a marginally decent person, you would not vote for either the Democrat or the Republican. Not voting at all is more legitimate than voting for either one. Your vote implies your consent or approval, and if you are a decent person, you would withhold it, and all arguments that you should vote for the "lesser of two evils" would sound ridiculous to you. After all, your vote is far more likely to be uncounted or miscounted through error or fraud than to be the deciding vote.

Because racism is particularly revolting, many people would be persuaded by the argument that it is wrong to vote for either party. But in our universe, both parties are explicitly anti-racist, and so many would think the anti-Two Party argument doesn't apply to us.

But the Democrats and Republicans do share values that are nearly as repugnant as racism would be. I'll mention just three.

First, that the President should have power to commit acts of war against countries that do not threaten or attack us. And they call this "humanitarian intervention." But the U.S. would be the first to object if some other country did the same thing. If France and Russia announced that Castro is a "brutal dictator" and that they would invade Cuba, overthrow him, and install a democracy, wouldn't Americans be the first to protest, calling them hypocritical and wondering why they won't just mind their own business? Although we're no friends of Castro ourselves, wouldn't we try to stand in the way of this supposed "crusade" for liberty and democracy? So why do we wonder why foreign poeples think the same of us?

Second, that the Bill of Rights should be ignored whenever Executive Power is inconvenient. One example of this is civil asset forfeiture.  Another is warrantless spying on American citizens.  Far from protecting us from terrorists, it appears the main reason for the government to have this power is to spy on and blackmail critics and political opponents; as Paul Craig Roberts once said, this should be obvious even to a naif.

Third, and most pertinent these days, they have the same philosophy of wealth creation. Whereas real wealth is created by human ingenuity and cooperation, the Two Parties seem to agree that access to credit is what creates wealth. And so they set up a system by which banks may lend out ten times what they have in deposits, where a central bank is the "lender of last resort" and the dollar is not backed by gold or silver but by . . . nothing. The result is not steady growth with better products at lower prices over time, but rather a cycle of booms and busts and rampant inflation. When things get really bad, as they are today, the solution they always resort to is . . . more credit. But pumping fake money into the system doesn't stimulate growth, it only creates price distortions, leading people to make poor economic decisions, leading to yet more mal-investment.

If the Democrats and Republicans were in agreement on just one of these issues, that would be enough reason to refuse to vote for either. Yet they agree on all three and more, and their "bitter disagreements" are based more on execution than principle.

So even if I may guess that either Obama or McCain may be marginally less bad than the other, that is no reason to express my approval of one or the other, especially because there's no chance my vote will determine the winner. It is far more sensible to vote for a third-party candidate more in line with my views, or to even play the lottery instead.

Comments (1)


Post a Comment

ELM from 98801 writes:
September 30, 2008
Mr Wilson, you are one of the great minds of our time, as usual I find your articles well done, very thought provoking and composed to make others think -- or even rethink. A great writer's goal is not centered on seeking agreement but possibly shedding new light to expand awareness; opening paths in closed minds.

While I totally understand not casting a vote to either side of the aisle and share in your sentiments as to the pros for not doing so, I will be filling in my absentee ballot against John McCain. I totally support your line below. How true!!!

"First, that the President should have power to commit acts of war against countries that do not threaten or attack us. And they call this "humanitarian intervention." But the U.S. would be the first to object if some other country did the same thing".

Re "Thou shalt kill" ~~
War monger Bush rode into high office supported by the votes of MM groupies and other groups locked into their own limited sphere of indoctrinated programing. A world of dogma that paradoxical elicites a form of hypocrisy. Supports killing an unborn fetus is a no no and killing innocent people during a war is a yes yes. KILLING IS KILLING no matter how you look at it.

The so-called righteous moralists that helped put war monger Bush in office more than likely will be on repeat, vote for war monger McCain. The other Cain got threw out of the Garden of Eden for slewing his brother Abel. Hmmm! Thus, accordingly to the Prime Mover theory, killing deserves punishment. Ordering and carrying out the assasination of another leader in another country or sanctioning a war in another country where thousands are killed must carry a much bigger Prime Mover sentence than simply being thrown out of a garden. Ya think?

Try this punishment for size: "THROW THE BUMS OUT OF OFFICE".

Putting the trickle-down affect to work, suppose that voters are held accountable for being an assessory to war crimes. After all, the candidates -- WE, the people elect work for us and represent us, are acting in OUR behalf.

In conclusion, (tongue in cheek) dang good reason not to vote. With ya there Mr. Wilson!

Send Us Your Opinion
(Comments are moderated.)
Your Name:*


Your E-Mail Address:*
(Confidential. Will not be published.)


Location:


Comments:*
Note: In order to control automated spam submissions, URLs are no longer permitted in this form.



Verification:
Please type the letters you see above.

  Printer-Friendly

Bookmark and Share

» jim102670@yahoo.com


PO BOOKS BY JAMES LEROY WILSON
Ron Paul Is a Nut (and So Am I)
Published September 10, 2008

Forget about red states and blue states. Wilson's unique take on political topics is refreshingly not politics as usual.

» Buy Now
» More Information
RSS FEED
RSS Feed for James Leroy Wilson: RSS Feed for James Leroy Wilson
EMAIL ALERTS
Sign up to receive an e-mail notice when new articles by this author are published. Your address remains confidential, and you may cancel at any time. A confirmation email will be sent.

Your e-mail address:
po Books
Now Available!

Teachings of a Three Year Old... Turned Tyke,
by Hal Evan Caplan.

A father learns from the wisdom of his toddler.

More Information.

More by James Leroy Wilson
47 for 46 for 45
My favorite movies since when I was born
by James Leroy Wilson, 3/15/16
Hired Gun Quarterbacks
They rarely win the Super Bowl.
by James Leroy Wilson, 2/9/16
Fixing Football's Overtime
Get rid of the coin toss!
by James Leroy Wilson, 1/19/16
Solving the NBA's Conference Imbalance
Get rid of them!
by James Leroy Wilson, 5/26/15
The Problem of School
We develop differently, but arbitrary age rules punish us.
by James Leroy Wilson, 5/19/15
Deflating and defaming Tom Brady
Punishing without evidence
by James Leroy Wilson, 5/12/15
Should Floyd Mayweather be allowed to fight?
The Nevada Athletic Commission is wrong, but not for the reason you think.
by James Leroy Wilson, 4/28/15
» Complete List (565)


RSS FEED
RSS Feed for James Leroy Wilson: RSS Feed for James Leroy Wilson

Recently Published
View Article The Missing Message in Dunkirk
What would make a good movie great
by Greg Asimakoupoulos, 9/22/17
Gone with the Wind
Praying for Irma's victims
by Greg Asimakoupoulos, 9/15/17
Remembering Mother Teresa
Republishing what I wrote twenty years ago
by Greg Asimakoupoulos, 9/8/17
Remembering the People's Princess
Celebrating the legacy of Lady Di twenty years later
by Greg Asimakoupoulos, 9/1/17
The Gospel According to Fast-Food
A tip of the hat to two fast-food giants
by Greg Asimakoupoulos, 8/25/17
A Solar Eclipse for the Ages
Look up! Your redemption draweth nigh!
by Greg Asimakoupoulos, 8/18/17
A Family Reunion Prayer
Contemplating the beauty of our family tree
by Greg Asimakoupoulos, 8/11/17

Get the Partial Observer's
'recently published' headlines via RSS.


RSS Feed for Recently Published PO Articles    What is RSS?
Reproduction of original material from The Partial Observer without written permission is strictly prohibited.
The opinions expressed by site contributors do not necessarily reflect those of the editors.
Copyright ©2000-2017 partialobserver.com. All rights reserved.
Home · Site Map · Top