Home
Loading
  Contact Us    
A Spending Cut Spree

Ideas for getting the federal budget under control.

by James Leroy Wilson
December 7, 2010

Bookmark and Share
A Spending Cut Spree

Last week, the President's Fiscal Responsibility Commission issued its recommendations. Although there is much to criticize in it, it is good to see some recognition in Washington of the need to do something about the debt crisis.

The Cato Institute's Chris Edwards has also introduced a plan, and one piece of information he reveals is striking. He notes that "In fiscal 2011, federal aid to the states will total $646 billion, which will be distributed through more than 800 separate programs."
That averages out to almost $13 billion per state. Considering the average population of a state is over 6 million people, that's around 2,100 in per capital spending.
Here's a suggestion for what to do with that money:
1.       Abolish ALL of these programs
2.       Send the money, on more or less a per capita basis, to the state government, allowing each state legislature to decide how to spend it
3.       Cut this aid by 20% every year for ten years; by the tenth year, it will be just $1.4 billion for the average state
With this money, a state could continue to fund programs previously mandated by the Feds, or could scrap what it sees as unnecessary programs and focus the money on more urgent needs. It would also operate with the knowledge that almost 90% of this money will not be there for them in ten years, and they could plan ahead and make choices about what is necessary and what is not.
Edwards also notes that there are 2,000 subsidies for individuals and businesses, although he doesn't give a figure of the total amount spent. But again here's a suggestion:
1.       Abolish ALL of these programs
2.       With money saved from individual subsidies, give a per-capita tax rebate to all individual income tax filers in the U.S.
3.       Cut this rebate amount by 20% every year for ten years
I'm not offering anything concrete, but I would ask questions that might spur recommendations for other cuts:
·         Why do we have troops in 120 different countries, and why are we shouldering the defense of wealthy nations like South Korea, Japan, and Germany?
·         What are we doing in Iraq and Afghanistan, and why?
·         Is foreign aid "humanitarian," or is it a means to exert influence and tell other countries what to do?
·         Even if we concede a federal role in helping the poor and the handicapped, why is it necessary to provide welfare payments (Social Security) and health care to middle-class and wealthy elderly people?
·         Are there any laws regarding drug patents, health care professional licensing, and insurance regulation that causes health care in America to be so expensive?
·         If it wasn't so expensive (labor regulations, payroll taxes, health insurance requirements) to start a business and hire people, would we really need to pay unemployment benefits?
It is easy to claim that my suggestions would never be implemented, and that these questions will fall on deaf ears in Washington. Typical D.C. politicians and bureaucrats espouse the ideologies of control freaks. That's why they want all of life – in America and throughout the world – to be funded by D.C. and regulated by D.C. They won't give up their power easily.
On the other hand, the looming bankruptcy of the U.S. may give them no choice. Roger C. Altman and Richard N. Haass are by no means small-government ideologues, but they write in Foreign Affairs that if American politicians don't get spending under control, global capital markets will force them. This happened in 1979, after Jimmy Carter proposed a budget with larger-than-expected deficits:
"That was the last straw. The dollar plunged, triggering an international financial crisis. Within one week, markets had forced the Federal Reserve to raise interest rates sharply and Carter to retract his budget, generating a U-turn in U.S. economic policy."
Today's budget mess is worse than back then. Either American politicians can be proactive in averting the mess, or the mess will come and austerity will follow. We can either wait until China stops purchasing Treasury bonds, or we can take action now.
I, for one, do not share the ideology of Altman, Haass, or the Fiscal Responsibility Commission. They all seem to think that more government is still the answer to life's problems; I think less government and more freedom will bring about a more prosperous world. But I do agree that we should take action now instead of waiting for a dollar collapse.

(0 Comments)
Post a Comment

Send Us Your Opinion
(Comments are moderated.)
Your Name:*


Your E-Mail Address:*
(Confidential. Will not be published.)


Location:


Comments:*
Note: In order to control automated spam submissions, URLs are no longer permitted in this form.



Verification:
Please type the letters you see above.

  Printer-Friendly

Bookmark and Share

» jim102670@yahoo.com


PO BOOKS BY JAMES LEROY WILSON
Ron Paul Is a Nut (and So Am I)
Published September 10, 2008

Forget about red states and blue states. Wilson's unique take on political topics is refreshingly not politics as usual.

» Buy Now
» More Information
RSS FEED
RSS Feed for James Leroy Wilson: RSS Feed for James Leroy Wilson
EMAIL ALERTS
Sign up to receive an e-mail notice when new articles by this author are published. Your address remains confidential, and you may cancel at any time. A confirmation email will be sent.

Your e-mail address:
po Books
Now Available!

Teachings of a Three Year Old... Turned Tyke,
by Hal Evan Caplan.

A father learns from the wisdom of his toddler.

More Information.

More by James Leroy Wilson
47 for 46 for 45
My favorite movies since when I was born
by James Leroy Wilson, 3/15/16
Hired Gun Quarterbacks
They rarely win the Super Bowl.
by James Leroy Wilson, 2/9/16
Fixing Football's Overtime
Get rid of the coin toss!
by James Leroy Wilson, 1/19/16
Solving the NBA's Conference Imbalance
Get rid of them!
by James Leroy Wilson, 5/26/15
The Problem of School
We develop differently, but arbitrary age rules punish us.
by James Leroy Wilson, 5/19/15
Deflating and defaming Tom Brady
Punishing without evidence
by James Leroy Wilson, 5/12/15
Should Floyd Mayweather be allowed to fight?
The Nevada Athletic Commission is wrong, but not for the reason you think.
by James Leroy Wilson, 4/28/15
» Complete List (565)


RSS FEED
RSS Feed for James Leroy Wilson: RSS Feed for James Leroy Wilson

Recently Published
View Article A Godwink Defined
Making sense of the coincidences of life
by Greg Asimakoupoulos, 12/6/19
Making Deposits in the Blessing Bank
A grateful heart is a great investment
by Greg Asimakoupoulos, 11/27/19
A Shepherd in Sneakers
Celebrating the ministry of Fred Rogers
by Greg Asimakoupoulos, 11/22/19
Feeding Our Nightmares
The dangerous diet of late night news
by Greg Asimakoupoulos, 11/15/19
Saluting Puget Sound Honor Flights
Pledging allegiance to our Veterans
by Greg Asimakoupoulos, 11/8/19
The Tale of the Flameless Taper
An All-Saints Day Reminder
by Greg Asimakoupoulos, 11/1/19
Sharing Love, Giving Hope
A tribute to pastors for Clergy Appreciation Month
by Greg Asimakoupoulos, 10/25/19

Get the Partial Observer's
'recently published' headlines via RSS.


RSS Feed for Recently Published PO Articles    What is RSS?
Reproduction of original material from The Partial Observer without written permission is strictly prohibited.
The opinions expressed by site contributors do not necessarily reflect those of the editors.
Copyright ©2000-2019 partialobserver.com. All rights reserved.
Home · Site Map · Top