Contact Us    
Democracy in America 2004

It barely exists.

by James Leroy Wilson
April 8, 2004

Bookmark and Share

Democracy in America 2004_James Leroy Wilson-It Barely Exists

I have written some critical words about democracy over the past year. Following the work of Hans Hermann Hoppe in Democracy: the God that Failed, I have concluded that Frederic Bastiat was right: "The State is the great fiction by which everyone tries to live at the expense of everybody else." Democracy has the allure of taking from the rich to help the rest of us. It has the added allure of providing for a "higher calling" of bonding the people together for public service and sacrifice - Democracy is the first refuge of those liberals who detest traditional religion. And it appeals to a sense of fairness - "one person, one vote."

And actually, it is not democracy itself that is the problem, it is the great Modern plague of nationalism - the centralization of power. As Lord Acton said, "Power tends to corrupt, and absolute power corrupts absolutely." The more power is transferred from local to national government, and the more responsibilities the national government seeks to provide (charity, health care, wage and price controls, banking), the more powerful and corrupting it becomes. Democracy on such a large scale is inherently corrupt - it corrupts politicians sacrificing honesty for votes, and it corrupts the people who now believe they are entitled with their votes to control the wealth, lives, and customs of strangers in distant states for their selfish economic well-being or moral satisfaction. No campaign finance law or other "reform" can possibly fix this.

This national democracy isn't even real, for it is based on the false pretense that anyone could be well-informed about national affairs. The United States as a whole is just too large in area and population for anyone to really know what's going on or what ought to be done. Particularly, national democracy places too much trust in "the people" acting through the national government to manage the economy. Here, ignorance is so vast that people tend to agree with whatever economic "solutions" would be most personally satisfying. You'd think that the break-up of the Soviet Union in 1991 would establish the fact that governments are unable to manage economies.

If the people aren't well-informed, then whatever their votes may say, the outcome can't possibly be "democracy." How can people give their consent to something about which they are unable to comprehend?

For democracy to genuinely exist, then, it must be on a small, local scale, acting on indiviudals directly. Laws involving property, the environment, crime, and culture must be as local as possible. Many things in the global and national economy may directly affect the individual, but the "economy" can not be controlled politically. Where the individual can exercise some knowledgeable and direct democratic control is in his own community - something he is well-informed about.

Local democracy is not only a better-informed democracy, it is more democratic in and of itself. In the federal system, one vote is among several hundred thousand to determine a Congressman, one of millions to determine a Senator, and one of a hundred million to determine a President. But it doesn't take many votes to determine the election of local boards and local officials. If more power devolved to the states of the Union, and further devolved from the states to counties, municipalities, townships, and even neighborhoods, the more democratic our nation would really be.

But I think there are additional pre-conditions for democracy to truly exist. Democracy is not the "poor and huddled masses" seeking economic justice. Likewise, democracy is impossible if the people are not free. The purpose of democracy and of civil government should be to determine property rights and the rules for community life. Three requirements - the requirements for freedom - must exist for there to be genuine democracy instead of mere voting:

1. The right to keep and bear arms. In the antebellum South, slaves were not allowed to own guns. It is no accident that they were then denied the fruits of their labor - instead getting "cradle to grave" care. (It is also no accident that modern liberals who favor high income taxes and the welfare state are hostile to the right to bear arms.) The right to protect yourself - the right to life - is necessary to freedom. If the people are not free, then their votes are not genuinely democratic but rather a striving for personal security or advantage.

2. The right to move - to "vote with your feet." No one must be compelled to live under laws he finds inhospitable to his interests. Life is unfair to everyone, and therefore people make trade-offs. They might live with small local injustices than make the sacrifice to move elsewhere, or do the opposite. But no democracy ever built a Berlin Wall. Mass migration from a locality would be evidence that taxes were too high and/or laws unjust and oppressive, and/or "public" services were inadequate. If people are free to move, then local governments would serve, rather than exploit, their local populations.

3.Respect for property rights. If majority rule or police powers can arbitarily take from one to give to another because somebody persuaded the majority that this is "just," then no one really has any property rights - everything is subject to the tyranny of a majority.

Democracy must be local for it to be well-informed. But even in those conditions, the people must have the right to life and self-defense, the liberty to leave, and the protection of property from arbitrary control. If they are not genuinely free - if government is the master rather than the servant of the people - then there is no democracy at all.

Democracy might create many laws outsiders might find tyrannical - from Sunday-closing laws to obsenity laws, to laws regarding sexual conduct. to laws prohibiting smoking in private restaurants, to excessive taxes. But when these laws are confined to local communities, at least dissenters are free to leave, to "vote with their feet."

There are three types of civil government:

1. That which protects life and property, but then leaves us free to do as we please (my preference);

2. Government which reflects the values of the local community;

3. Government which is the master of the entire country.

It is ironic how advocates of "social democracy" and "neo-conservativism" advocate #3, even though nothing is less democratic or conservative than forcing top-down national social policies throughout the nation

Comments (3)

Post a Comment

Jonathan Wilson from Chicago writes:
April 8, 2004
James Leroy Wilson for President! Or, um, governor, or mayor, or school-board. Anyway, thank you for an excellent and educational article.

Marc B. from Harlan, IA writes:
April 8, 2004
Great article. There is a man running for president in 2004 that asks, Do you want government to be your master, or your servant? That man is Aaron Russo of the Libertarian party.

PaulM from Somewhere in Florida writes:
April 15, 2004
Tired arguments...

So democracy is sloppy. Is that big news? It's a work in progress, not a lofty ideal.

Send Us Your Opinion
(Comments are moderated.)
Your Name:*

Your E-Mail Address:*
(Confidential. Will not be published.)


Note: In order to control automated spam submissions, URLs are no longer permitted in this form.

Please type the letters you see above.


Bookmark and Share

Ron Paul Is a Nut (and So Am I)
Published September 10, 2008

Forget about red states and blue states. Wilson's unique take on political topics is refreshingly not politics as usual.

» Buy Now
» More Information
RSS Feed for James Leroy Wilson: RSS Feed for James Leroy Wilson
Sign up to receive an e-mail notice when new articles by this author are published. Your address remains confidential, and you may cancel at any time. A confirmation email will be sent.

Your e-mail address:
Democracy in America 2004
po Books
Now Available!

Teachings of a Three Year Old... Turned Tyke,
by Hal Evan Caplan.

A father learns from the wisdom of his toddler.

More Information.

More by James Leroy Wilson
47 for 46 for 45
My favorite movies since when I was born
by James Leroy Wilson, 3/15/16
Hired Gun Quarterbacks
They rarely win the Super Bowl.
by James Leroy Wilson, 2/9/16
Fixing Football's Overtime
Get rid of the coin toss!
by James Leroy Wilson, 1/19/16
Solving the NBA's Conference Imbalance
Get rid of them!
by James Leroy Wilson, 5/26/15
The Problem of School
We develop differently, but arbitrary age rules punish us.
by James Leroy Wilson, 5/19/15
Deflating and defaming Tom Brady
Punishing without evidence
by James Leroy Wilson, 5/12/15
Should Floyd Mayweather be allowed to fight?
The Nevada Athletic Commission is wrong, but not for the reason you think.
by James Leroy Wilson, 4/28/15
» Complete List (565)

RSS Feed for James Leroy Wilson: RSS Feed for James Leroy Wilson

Recently Published
View Article A Prodigal Father's Day
The patient, persistent, unconditional love of our Heavenly Father
by Greg Asimakoupoulos, 6/18/21
My Girl Friday
A toast to all administrative assistants
by Greg Asimakoupoulos, 6/11/21
Two Giant Hands in Tulsa
Praying for forgiveness and healing
by Greg Asimakoupoulos, 6/4/21
To a Field of Dreams
Memorial Day ponderings
by Greg Asimakoupoulos, 5/28/21
Don't Mask! Don't Tell!
It's about time for about face
by Greg Asimakoupoulos, 5/21/21
Liz Cheney's Not Lon Chaney
Why recent events on Capitol Hill resemble a horror show
by Greg Asimakoupoulos, 5/14/21
A Mothers' Day Hymn
Remembering our moms with gratitude to our Heavenly Father
by Greg Asimakoupoulos, 5/7/21

Get the Partial Observer's
'recently published' headlines via RSS.

RSS Feed for Recently Published PO Articles    What is RSS?

Reproduction of original material from The Partial Observer without written permission is strictly prohibited.
The opinions expressed by site contributors do not necessarily reflect those of the editors.
Copyright ©2000-2021 partialobserver.com. All rights reserved.
Home · Site Map · Top