Contact Us    
Why Bush Will Lose

Conservatives have no reason to vote for him.

by James Leroy Wilson
October 21, 2004

Bookmark and Share

Back and forth I go. I do not want George W. Bush to win this election. And I don’t want to give his thuggish radio-talk supporters, and whom Ilana Mercer calls Bush’s media “Stepford Sluts” the satisfaction.

But then there’s Kerry’s supporters. Who are they? People who hate George W. Bush. That’s it.

I suppose they don’t want to repeat the same “mistake” of nominating a George McGovern, an anti-war candidate, which is why Howard Dean was sandbagged early on. But in 1968, they nominated pro-war Hubert Humphrey, and what good did it do them? Because Democrats are lining up behind a pro-war candidate again, I have no sympathy for them. I want them to lose. They had a chance to be right on one thing, and they still screwed it up.

That’s what hatred for the sitting President can do. Bush and Nixon are similar. In all practical matters that affect most people’s lives, they are to the left of Jimmy Carter and Bill Clinton. Spend, spend, spend. Cave, cave, cave on every spending package. Nixon, like Reagan, at least had the excuse that he was working with a Democratic Congress. Bush doesn’t have that excuse.

In 2000, he came in promising to “change the tone” in Washington. Some of the early charges against him were off base. Main example, by refusing to sign the Kyoto Protocol, he was following the unanimous desire of the Senate. And you know that some things Clinton got away with, such as refusing to sign the international land-mine ban, would have provoked outrage against Bush.

But what has Bush done, with two years of complete Republican control, and two years near-complete (with a split in the Senate)? He has increased domestic spending at rates not seen since the Johnson administration. The old Leftist themes - farmers, schools, old people - got a response from Bush of, "Okay, how much?" He “protected” American jobs with tariffs on steel and lumber. When faced with McCain-Feingold, he signed the bill into law instead of vetoing it on First Amendment grounds. He has provided amnesty for illegal (largely Hispanic) immigrants. He has expanded a War on Obesity. He killed a pro-life Republican challenge to the liberal, pro-choice Sen. Arlen Spector of Pennsylvania, who’s in line to become chair of the judiciary committee, and has spent millions paying for abortions. He has even increased funding for the National Endowment for the Arts, something Clinton was aware was too hot to touch. He speaks as if all religions are equally good and essentially the same, when a more astute Christian politician would avoid public religious ceremonies of any kind as much as possible.

And with each move, he has earned nothing but greater and greater scorn from the Left. Bush came in to “change the tone” and show us what “compassionate conservatism” is. He has been deathly afraid of the veto pen, and he is unafraid of deficit spending and ever-higher debt ceilings. Yet, the Left has convinced themselves that Bush is an extreme, anti-government capitalist. That’s a point Machiavelli made - the more you give the people, the more they resent you and demand more. In our history, FDR is the only exception to the rule

Four years ago, I had the sense that Bush would win the election and wrote my first article at the Partial Observer about it. Although I then considered myself a conservative, and now am a libertarian, I believe my analysis of what a Bush Presidency on the domestic front would lead us was essentially correct (although I did give Bush more credit for intelligence and competence than he deserved).

Bush’s crumbs to the libertarian and conservative base (miniscule tax rate cuts) were not enough. It was obvious that Bush had grand, expensive visions for America. Even on the rhetorical level, he hardly ever mocked Washington and the size of government. Those were not, and are not, his values. He doesn’t want Washington, D.C., to secure our lives, liberty, and property. Instead, he wants to improve our lives for us. Whether we want him to or not.

Call it what you will, but it is not conservative. Bush has alienated the GOP’s conservative base. With smaller, Constitutional government and an “America First” foreign policy as its political pillars, conservatives no longer have a voice, or a home, in the Republican Party. George Bush hasn’t given them a single reason to vote for him. Not one.

So what will happen this Election Day? In 2000, four million normally Republican “Christian conservatives” - overlapping but not the same as my“political” conservatives - did not vote at all. Apparently, they didn’t trust Bush. Karl Rove, Bush’s political strategist, has been determined to win them back.

I suppose there are two things left to exploit - abortion and homosexuality. I suppose the right mix of lies and exaggerations may get some of them back. But that’s hard to believe: if they didn’t vote for Bush in 2000 because of the abortion issue, why would they now?

Bush’s best hope is that the ignorant remain ignorant. That they hold to the belief that Saddam was behind 9-11, that “they hate us because we are free” and that the insurgents in Iraq are actually terrorists.

But I doubt that the number of votes he gains from the War on Terror will come close to the number of votes he’s lost.

Comments (3)

Post a Comment

Gloria Barker from Arizona writes:
October 22, 2004
What you have to say may have appeal to the left, but not to people of moral character. It is easy to pass your hatred off to one person when that person is and stands for something you hate. It doesn't matter who that person may be, except it is easier if they are in high places such as the Presidency. They say they hate Pres. Bush, but this is not the true reason and you and I know it. The bottom line it is a hatred toward Christianity period. It has been this way from the beginning of time. It is only getting worse. President Bush just happens to be a man of morals and not ashamed of his faith and it is much easier to rise up against him when hatred is the reining force. He is the right man in the right place for such times as we are living in. I shudder to think what the next four years will bring if he does not win.

James Leroy Wilson from The Swamp writes:
October 22, 2004
A compelling right-wing, conservative Christian case against President Bush can be found at Culture Repair (www.culturerepair.com).

August Ecklund from Arlington Hts, IL writes:
October 22, 2004
I do not understand Gloria Barker’s response to James Leroy Wilson’s column. Why would his argument appeal to the left when he accuses President George Bush of caving to the left? I have never heard anyone on the left criticize George Bush because he is too liberal. James Leroy Wilson clearly is writing to people with traditionally right-wing values.

If Gloria Barker believes that George Bush is the right man in the right place, then I challenge her to address the issues that James Leroy Wilson raised. As a conservative, how does she justify the highest domestic spending rates in 40 years resulting in a larger government and a growing deficit? Can she defend McCain Feingold, tariffs on steel & lumber, and increased funding for the National Endowment for the Arts? Also, let us not forget that President Bush campaigned for the $400 billion Medicare Prescription Drug benefit, which is the largest entitlement program since the “Great Society Liberal,” LBJ, declared war on poverty. On each of these issues, President Bush supported the traditionally liberal position, so why should conservatives support George Bush.

Send Us Your Opinion
(Comments are moderated.)
Your Name:*

Your E-Mail Address:*
(Confidential. Will not be published.)


Note: In order to control automated spam submissions, URLs are no longer permitted in this form.

Please type the letters you see above.


Bookmark and Share

Ron Paul Is a Nut (and So Am I)
Published September 10, 2008

Forget about red states and blue states. Wilson's unique take on political topics is refreshingly not politics as usual.

» Buy Now
» More Information
RSS Feed for James Leroy Wilson: RSS Feed for James Leroy Wilson
Sign up to receive an e-mail notice when new articles by this author are published. Your address remains confidential, and you may cancel at any time. A confirmation email will be sent.

Your e-mail address:
Why Bush Will Lose
po Books
Now Available!

Teachings of a Three Year Old... Turned Tyke,
by Hal Evan Caplan.

A father learns from the wisdom of his toddler.

More Information.

More by James Leroy Wilson
47 for 46 for 45
My favorite movies since when I was born
by James Leroy Wilson, 3/15/16
Hired Gun Quarterbacks
They rarely win the Super Bowl.
by James Leroy Wilson, 2/9/16
Fixing Football's Overtime
Get rid of the coin toss!
by James Leroy Wilson, 1/19/16
Solving the NBA's Conference Imbalance
Get rid of them!
by James Leroy Wilson, 5/26/15
The Problem of School
We develop differently, but arbitrary age rules punish us.
by James Leroy Wilson, 5/19/15
Deflating and defaming Tom Brady
Punishing without evidence
by James Leroy Wilson, 5/12/15
Should Floyd Mayweather be allowed to fight?
The Nevada Athletic Commission is wrong, but not for the reason you think.
by James Leroy Wilson, 4/28/15
» Complete List (565)

RSS Feed for James Leroy Wilson: RSS Feed for James Leroy Wilson

Recently Published
View Article My Girl Friday
A toast to all administrative assistants
by Greg Asimakoupoulos, 6/11/21
Two Giant Hands in Tulsa
Praying for forgiveness and healing
by Greg Asimakoupoulos, 6/4/21
To a Field of Dreams
Memorial Day ponderings
by Greg Asimakoupoulos, 5/28/21
Don't Mask! Don't Tell!
It's about time for about face
by Greg Asimakoupoulos, 5/21/21
Liz Cheney's Not Lon Chaney
Why recent events on Capitol Hill resemble a horror show
by Greg Asimakoupoulos, 5/14/21
A Mothers' Day Hymn
Remembering our moms with gratitude to our Heavenly Father
by Greg Asimakoupoulos, 5/7/21
A Crumbling Foundation
What are we to make of Bill and Melinda Gates' divorce?
by Greg Asimakoupoulos, 5/4/21

Get the Partial Observer's
'recently published' headlines via RSS.

RSS Feed for Recently Published PO Articles    What is RSS?

Reproduction of original material from The Partial Observer without written permission is strictly prohibited.
The opinions expressed by site contributors do not necessarily reflect those of the editors.
Copyright ©2000-2021 partialobserver.com. All rights reserved.
Home · Site Map · Top