Contact Us    
The Litmus Test

Politicians who are wrong on this one issue are evidently corrupt and can not be trusted.

by James Leroy Wilson
January 22, 2009

Bookmark and Share
The Litmus Test

I don't recall the writer, but someone recently noted that Barack Obama is a blank slate on which many Americans project their own hopes and beliefs.

Not me. That Obama is so unlike his predecessor in so many ways doesn't, by that fact, indicate to me that he's someone to put one's trust.

Yes, his election comes as a relief, considering the alternative. But there are too many policy differences with which I disagree. And one issue goes deeper than "honest disagreement," it's a matter of character.

There is one issue which, if a politician gets wrong, you have every reason to doubt whether he is ever acting in the people's interest.

Obviously, I believe those who disagree don't have valid arguments, because otherwise I'd agree with them. But on most issues, I understand that they at least have valid concerns.

So when I say there should be no gun laws, they raise concerns about safety and murders.

When I say separate school and state, they will wonder how children will learn to read.

When I say America should mind its own business, they will invoke the words "appeasement" and "genocide."

When I say the government shouldn't take away our liberty in the War on Terror, they will raise concerns about security.

When I say that the the civil government's jurisdiction does not legitimately include what's inside our bodies, they'll raise concerns about drug addiction, obesity, or the moral status of the fetus.

In other words, they're accustomed to government providing certain services and imposing restrictions. That they would raise objections to one who wants smaller government is understandable. That they would agree with the small-goverment agenda on some, but not all issues, is also understandable.

Likewise, those who embrace the small government agenda entirely will disagree with each other in priorities and implementation.

But what is shared among people who disagree with each other on these and other issues is a desire to do what's best for the people. There is one, issue, however, in which one side is clearly right and the other so clearly wrong, one would have to wonder about the motives of those on the wrong side.

Presidents tend not to believe in smaller government. So for advocates of small government, expressing a preference for one candidate or the other comes to the "least-bad" option. But that doesn't mean one dislikes both candidates. I don't dislike Obama. In 2000, I didn't dislike Georege W. Bush.

But in 2000, I made the mistake of having some "hope" in Bush that he would lead the country in new, better directions - particularly in his stated goal of a "humble foreign policy." While I disagreed with him on several issues and didn't vote for him, I more or less trusted his judgment at the start. That didn't work out so well.

And recently it occurred to me why it was a mistake. It wasn't because he was wrong on so many issues - I could live with that. But he was wrong on one particular issue.

And all but maybe a handful in Congress are also wrong. That is why they can't be trusted to do the "right thing."

It is why Obama can't be trusted either. Because he's wrong on this one issue, you can never be sure he has the best interest of the people at heart.

What distinguishes it from all other issues and policies is that, not only are arguments for it invalid, there isn't  even an understandable point to be raised. As a matter of morality, it's neutral; as a matter of compassion, the government's position is un-compassionate. As a matter of economics, the government's position is against our interests. Environmentally, the government[s position is harmful.

So what is this issue?

Industrial hemp prohibition.

Wikipedia describes hemp's many advantages:

Industrial hemp has many uses, including paper, textiles, biodegradable plastics, health food, and fuel. It is one of the fastest growing biomasses known,[citation needed] and one of the earliest domesticated plants known. It also runs parallel with the "Green Future" objectives that are becoming increasingly popular. Hemp requires little to no pesticides, no herbicides, controls erosion of the topsoil, and produces oxygen. Furthermore, hemp can be used to replace many potentially harmful products, such as tree paper (the processing of which uses bleaches and other toxic chemicals, and contributes to deforestation), cosmetics, and plastics, most of which are petroleum-based and do not decompose easily.

Yet, the U.S. Government refuses to distinguish non-psychoactive industrial hemp from marijuana.

Not only is there no "good" reason it doesn't distinguish between them, there doesn't seem to be any reason at all. The conclusion is inescapable: domestic production of industrial hemp products is prohibited in order to protect domestic lumber, petroleum, and agriculture industries from competition.

The result is fewer jobs and higher prices for the American people.

What's Obama's record? Enthusiastic support for subsidizing agribusiness with corn ethanol subsidies, although hemp "produces up to ten times more ethanol per acre than corn."

Hemp prohibition is proof that the federal government is essentially a racket to enrich a few people at the expense of the rest of us. Politicians, like Obama, who support this status quo are likely involved in this racket. Which, by definition, means they don't have the people's interest at heart.

Now if Obama comes out and publicly supports an end to hemp prohibition, I'll gladly change my tune. But I don't see any evidence that he will. And if he won't, why should I trust him?

Post a Comment

Send Us Your Opinion
(Comments are moderated.)
Your Name:*

Your E-Mail Address:*
(Confidential. Will not be published.)


Note: In order to control automated spam submissions, URLs are no longer permitted in this form.

Please type the letters you see above.


Bookmark and Share

» jim102670@yahoo.com

Ron Paul Is a Nut (and So Am I)
Published September 10, 2008

Forget about red states and blue states. Wilson's unique take on political topics is refreshingly not politics as usual.

» Buy Now
» More Information
RSS Feed for James Leroy Wilson: RSS Feed for James Leroy Wilson
Sign up to receive an e-mail notice when new articles by this author are published. Your address remains confidential, and you may cancel at any time. A confirmation email will be sent.

Your e-mail address:
po Books
Now Available!

Teachings of a Three Year Old... Turned Tyke,
by Hal Evan Caplan.

A father learns from the wisdom of his toddler.

More Information.

More by James Leroy Wilson
47 for 46 for 45
My favorite movies since when I was born
by James Leroy Wilson, 3/15/16
Hired Gun Quarterbacks
They rarely win the Super Bowl.
by James Leroy Wilson, 2/9/16
Fixing Football's Overtime
Get rid of the coin toss!
by James Leroy Wilson, 1/19/16
Solving the NBA's Conference Imbalance
Get rid of them!
by James Leroy Wilson, 5/26/15
The Problem of School
We develop differently, but arbitrary age rules punish us.
by James Leroy Wilson, 5/19/15
Deflating and defaming Tom Brady
Punishing without evidence
by James Leroy Wilson, 5/12/15
Should Floyd Mayweather be allowed to fight?
The Nevada Athletic Commission is wrong, but not for the reason you think.
by James Leroy Wilson, 4/28/15
» Complete List (565)

RSS Feed for James Leroy Wilson: RSS Feed for James Leroy Wilson

Recently Published
View Article The Last Post
The Partial Observer is no more
by Greg Asimakoupoulos, 10/15/21
The Challenges and Chances of Change
Announcing a coming change
by Greg Asimakoupoulos, 10/8/21
On Each Continent We Worship
A new hymn for World Communion Sunday
by Greg Asimakoupoulos, 10/1/21
Tending the Family Tree
A grandparent's charge
by Greg Asimakoupoulos, 9/24/21
The Cross is Our Ground Zero
Why the cross is the crux of our faith
by Greg Asimakoupoulos, 9/17/21
A Score Recalled
Remembering September 11th twenty years later
by Greg Asimakoupoulos, 9/10/21
A Symphony Heard Around the World
Remembering September 2, 1945
by Greg Asimakoupoulos, 9/3/21

Get the Partial Observer's
'recently published' headlines via RSS.

RSS Feed for Recently Published PO Articles    What is RSS?
Reproduction of original material from The Partial Observer without written permission is strictly prohibited.
The opinions expressed by site contributors do not necessarily reflect those of the editors.
Copyright ©2000-2021 partialobserver.com. All rights reserved.
Home · Site Map · Top