Contact Us    
Ballot Access, Not More Laws

How campaign finance laws hurt third parties.

by James Leroy Wilson
January 30, 2002

Bookmark and Share

Ballot Access, Not More Laws_James Leroy Wilson-How campaign finance laws hurt third parties. The best advice for writing a college research paper I ever received was "Don't make as your thesis something that is too obvious to mention but impossible to prove." My professor's example was his friend's attempt to prove that Supreme Court Justices let personal political ideology influence their decisions. Well, duh. But unless the Justices themselves freely admit it, how is it proven?

Ideally, ideology is for the politicians, our elected officials. They're the ones who make the laws in the first place. But with Enron's bankruptcy, and news of its diverse and large political campaign contributions, we hear renewed calls for "campaign finance reform." Politicians, our reformers say, aren't actually influenced by ideology at all, but rather by the donors of their campaigns.

This is not so obvious, yet perhaps not as hard to prove. You'd think the National Rifle Association would support candidates who have already spoken out in favor of private gun ownership, not give money to an ideological opponent in the hopes of a flip-flop. But it is where you do see flip-flops, where legislators supported one position and then vote for the opposite position, without any benefit to their own districts or states, that we can see the influence of campaign donations. For we can't fault candidates for accepting support from ideological soul-mates, nor can we prohibit flip-flops to pander to the voters. We can, however, fault candidates whose reversals defy explanation were it not for the support of certain contributors. At that point, the question of integrity should arise.

But who should ask it? The reformers want to make it even harder for ideological supporters to make campaign donations to candidates and political parties, restrict the amounts donated, and even to freely and independently express their support. But they're not the problem. Nor does blame lie with those legislators who support the same things as the people in their districts. Conservative, southern Democrats don't get elected because of special interest donations, but because their districts are conservative. The same goes for northeastern, liberal Republicans and their districts. Even though special interest contributions may be present, they do not conclusively establish corruption. When you're already a moderate, who's to prove that campaign donations moved you one way or the other?

It is not the government's, but rather the media's responsibility, if they chose, to call out the clear-cut, campaign donor-induced flip-flops. If the problem is as bad the as the reformers think, the stories, the scandals, would be on the front page every day. And if such stories were ever-present across the land, yet the corrupt incumbents kept getting re-elected, then it would be clear that the real problem is actually too many laws and too many restrictive ballot-access rules, not too few.

Because in too many, actually nearly all, Congressional districts in the United States, the voters are faced with either a "lifer" incumbent from the Democratic or Republican Party with nominal or no opposition, or a strong race between two candidates who each hope to become "lifers." Alternative voices, from the Libertarian, Green, or other parties are virtually shut out, because the laws require more voter signatures on their petitions drives than they do for Democrats and Republicans, while being held to the same campaign finance laws. So the only way to get the message across is through access to the media, which costs money. It's a downward spiral for alternative or "third" parties, deliberately and cynically created by Democrats and Republicans who fear real social and political changes for freedom and justice. Already held to stringent campaign finance laws, third party candidates can't even get their names on the ballot as easily. The public is hardly even given a chance as a "protest" vote, because the Democrats and Republicans, and the legislative bodies across the land which they control, just don't want that.

If ideological supporters, of whatever wealth, were merely allowed to spend what they desired to support their favored candidates, we wouldn't have the perceived problem of "the appearance of impropriety" that campaign-finance reformers are obsessed about. Instead, we'd see candidates bluntly say, as Ronald Reagan did about controversial supporters: "I didn't accept their money because I support them, I accepted their money because they support me."

And there is nothing wrong with that.

Post a Comment

Send Us Your Opinion
(Comments are moderated.)
Your Name:*

Your E-Mail Address:*
(Confidential. Will not be published.)


Note: In order to control automated spam submissions, URLs are no longer permitted in this form.

Please type the letters you see above.


Bookmark and Share

Ron Paul Is a Nut (and So Am I)
Published September 10, 2008

Forget about red states and blue states. Wilson's unique take on political topics is refreshingly not politics as usual.

» Buy Now
» More Information
RSS Feed for James Leroy Wilson: RSS Feed for James Leroy Wilson
Sign up to receive an e-mail notice when new articles by this author are published. Your address remains confidential, and you may cancel at any time. A confirmation email will be sent.

Your e-mail address:
Ballot Access, Not More Laws
po Books
Now Available!

Teachings of a Three Year Old... Turned Tyke,
by Hal Evan Caplan.

A father learns from the wisdom of his toddler.

More Information.

More by James Leroy Wilson
47 for 46 for 45
My favorite movies since when I was born
by James Leroy Wilson, 3/15/16
Hired Gun Quarterbacks
They rarely win the Super Bowl.
by James Leroy Wilson, 2/9/16
Fixing Football's Overtime
Get rid of the coin toss!
by James Leroy Wilson, 1/19/16
Solving the NBA's Conference Imbalance
Get rid of them!
by James Leroy Wilson, 5/26/15
The Problem of School
We develop differently, but arbitrary age rules punish us.
by James Leroy Wilson, 5/19/15
Deflating and defaming Tom Brady
Punishing without evidence
by James Leroy Wilson, 5/12/15
Should Floyd Mayweather be allowed to fight?
The Nevada Athletic Commission is wrong, but not for the reason you think.
by James Leroy Wilson, 4/28/15
» Complete List (565)

RSS Feed for James Leroy Wilson: RSS Feed for James Leroy Wilson

Recently Published
View Article The Cross is Our Ground Zero
Why the cross is the crux of our faith
by Greg Asimakoupoulos, 9/17/21
A Score Recalled
Remembering September 11th twenty years later
by Greg Asimakoupoulos, 9/10/21
A Symphony Heard Around the World
Remembering September 2, 1945
by Greg Asimakoupoulos, 9/3/21
We Cry for Justice
Uniting Christ followers in a biblical cause
by Greg Asimakoupoulos, 8/27/21
When Life Becomes a Maze
How to respond to the headlines
by Greg Asimakoupoulos, 8/20/21
Twelve Steps
What it takes to walk free
by Greg Asimakoupoulos, 8/13/21
But Wait! There's More!
Ron Popeil's death prompts thoughts of eternal life
by Greg Asimakoupoulos, 8/6/21

Get the Partial Observer's
'recently published' headlines via RSS.

RSS Feed for Recently Published PO Articles    What is RSS?

Reproduction of original material from The Partial Observer without written permission is strictly prohibited.
The opinions expressed by site contributors do not necessarily reflect those of the editors.
Copyright ©2000-2021 partialobserver.com. All rights reserved.
Home · Site Map · Top