Contact Us    
Intelligence and Ideology

Evaluating how conservatives and liberals weigh these two ingredients in government.

by James Leroy Wilson
November 22, 2000

Bookmark and Share

Intelligence and Ideology_James Leroy Wilson-Evaluating how conservatives and liberals weigh these two ingredients in government. One of the main differences in the American ideological divide is the value placed on intelligence. William F. Buckley has written that conservatives would rather be governed by the first three thousand names in the Boston telephone directory than by the Harvard faculty. Contemporary liberals, on the other hand, place greater faith in intelligence. You see it in statements by Democrats regarding the intelligence of persons on the Republican Presidential ticket. George W. Bush is "not ready" for the Presidency. Dan Quayle is dumb. Ronald Reagan's ideas were simplistic if not simple-minded.

This difference is caused by fundamentally different views of human nature. To the conservative, social ills are caused by sin. Human beings will tend to do wrong, to act selfishly, to be governed by passion. That is why conservatives place a high value on social institutions, including the family, organized religion, law, and government. Social institutions provide incentives to re-direct the selfish passions into activities that benefit others. The inclinations that lead to vice can become virtues. Lust is directed into love through marriage. The fear of God makes the vain man humble. The greedy impulse is checked by our laws and courts, which encourage honesty by punishing fraud. Ambition is curtailed by checks and balances in the structures of government, leaving little incentive for public service since history honors only the most courageous and patriotic.

The conservative also acknowledges that no person can be redeemed or perfected by such institutions, and as those institutions are themselves led and administered by flawed humans, they will always work imperfectly. As James Madison wrote, if men were angels, no government would be necessary. A utopian society is not on the conservative agenda. The task is to isolate and minimize social ills, so that the damage they do will not threaten the larger culture, while recognizing that anyone powerful enough to rid society of its evils is also powerful enough to create even greater evils through tyranny. A society based on individual freedom and autonomous institutions carries risks, but it doesn't risk totalitarianism.

Contemporary liberalism - what I think is more accurately called progressivism - holds that social ills are problems, and that problems can be solved. Human nature can start on the road to perfection once the problems have been solved. And the root of all social ills is inequality - economic, social, political. Once human equality is restored, justice will prevail in society and human potential will be unleashed, creating a progressivley better world.

Education is crucial: it promotes democratic (i.e., pro-equality) values in the young; perhaps more importantly, it trains experts in the social and behavioral sciences for the advancement of sound public policy. Intelligent leadership, and the appointment of intellectuals and experts to the federal judiciary and bureaucracy, will lead to social improvement. Smart planning will yield good results.

Conservatives do not trust anyone, even intellectuals, to centralize power in the name of social improvement. Leadership, to them, is based on nature (as in the case of parenthood), training, merit, and election. Moral authority is based on earned trust and shared values. But to the progressive, moral authority means having good intentions. Most social institutions, with their entrenched hierarchies and inequalities, are obstacles to a just society, and their defenders must have ulterior motives. Yet the central government is a necessary instrument to bring about social improvement, and its power must expand to meet its just mission. To have moral authority with the Left is to exalt the powers of Washington and to denigrate the principles underlying the marriage, family, religion, free enterprise, and local government.

It is not the case that conservatives discount intelligence entirely, but if one is wrong on the principles, intelligence won't help. While it is best to be both right and smart, is better to be right than smart. And in conservative eyes, being right politically is to limit the size and scope of centralized government. For the Left, which would like to see central government be responsible for everything, intelligence is an absolute necessity. You have to be very wise indeed to "plan" a good society.

Comments (3)

Post a Comment

Oche Dremon writes:
November 22, 2000
Dear Editor: I have it on good authority that James Leroy Wilson has misrepresented himself in his biography under his article which posted November 22. My sources identify that he is a critic of the left out of a thorough and examined political philosophy, and that he is not even close to rich. My sources say that if it turns out that James Leroy Wilson is very very rich, he has hidden his wealth, and my sources, being left-leaning, are going to make sure to find and redistribute his wealth to create a social order of equality--at least in his own family. That's what my sources say, anyway. Sincerely, Oche Dremon

Tom Holzel from Boston writes:
March 9, 2007
Excellent points, all. But this thesis, that pits sinfulness against intelligence is not quite right yet. We all know that ideology subverts rational thinking when the two collide. Intelligent people can be very perceptive as long as the subjects are not on the list of hot buttons.

So the real task becomes that of identifying the liberal/conservative ideological layers of hell. Ask a committed feminist why she does not extol the success of women making it in a man's world as far as Golda Meier, Indira Gandhi and Margaret Thatcher are concerned (who were all conservatives) and the answer you will get is that "they are not women"!

So we know that liberalism is more important to liberal feminists than feminism. What is the rest of the ranking scheme? And once discovered, can we measure how liberal/conservative anyone is, and even predict--based on this new scale--how they will react to any particular combination of characteristics?

Answers to these issues will do much to get to the bottom of the blinding ideology affliction

James Leroy Wilson from Independent Country writes:
March 10, 2007
I wrote this over six years ago. Back then, I thought conservatives supported small, decentralized government. I also did not believe then that George Bush was a narrow-minded, delusional ideologue, and would not have predicted that conservatives would have rewarded him with a second term after his disastrous first. I've been rethinking this column ever since I wrote it.

Send Us Your Opinion
(Comments are moderated.)
Your Name:*

Your E-Mail Address:*
(Confidential. Will not be published.)


Note: In order to control automated spam submissions, URLs are no longer permitted in this form.

Please type the letters you see above.


Bookmark and Share

Ron Paul Is a Nut (and So Am I)
Published September 10, 2008

Forget about red states and blue states. Wilson's unique take on political topics is refreshingly not politics as usual.

» Buy Now
» More Information
RSS Feed for James Leroy Wilson: RSS Feed for James Leroy Wilson
Sign up to receive an e-mail notice when new articles by this author are published. Your address remains confidential, and you may cancel at any time. A confirmation email will be sent.

Your e-mail address:
Intelligence and Ideology
po Books
Now Available!

Teachings of a Three Year Old... Turned Tyke,
by Hal Evan Caplan.

A father learns from the wisdom of his toddler.

More Information.

More by James Leroy Wilson
47 for 46 for 45
My favorite movies since when I was born
by James Leroy Wilson, 3/15/16
Hired Gun Quarterbacks
They rarely win the Super Bowl.
by James Leroy Wilson, 2/9/16
Fixing Football's Overtime
Get rid of the coin toss!
by James Leroy Wilson, 1/19/16
Solving the NBA's Conference Imbalance
Get rid of them!
by James Leroy Wilson, 5/26/15
The Problem of School
We develop differently, but arbitrary age rules punish us.
by James Leroy Wilson, 5/19/15
Deflating and defaming Tom Brady
Punishing without evidence
by James Leroy Wilson, 5/12/15
Should Floyd Mayweather be allowed to fight?
The Nevada Athletic Commission is wrong, but not for the reason you think.
by James Leroy Wilson, 4/28/15
» Complete List (565)

RSS Feed for James Leroy Wilson: RSS Feed for James Leroy Wilson

Recently Published
View Article The Cross is Our Ground Zero
Why the cross is the crux of our faith
by Greg Asimakoupoulos, 9/17/21
A Score Recalled
Remembering September 11th twenty years later
by Greg Asimakoupoulos, 9/10/21
A Symphony Heard Around the World
Remembering September 2, 1945
by Greg Asimakoupoulos, 9/3/21
We Cry for Justice
Uniting Christ followers in a biblical cause
by Greg Asimakoupoulos, 8/27/21
When Life Becomes a Maze
How to respond to the headlines
by Greg Asimakoupoulos, 8/20/21
Twelve Steps
What it takes to walk free
by Greg Asimakoupoulos, 8/13/21
But Wait! There's More!
Ron Popeil's death prompts thoughts of eternal life
by Greg Asimakoupoulos, 8/6/21

Get the Partial Observer's
'recently published' headlines via RSS.

RSS Feed for Recently Published PO Articles    What is RSS?

Reproduction of original material from The Partial Observer without written permission is strictly prohibited.
The opinions expressed by site contributors do not necessarily reflect those of the editors.
Copyright ©2000-2021 partialobserver.com. All rights reserved.
Home · Site Map · Top